Formulating a Strategy for an Independent Tlingit Nation – Part 2: Yakutat vs. Geohedral LLC

This is the second part in a series on developing a de facto Tlingit tribal nation in southeast Alaska. In part one of this series I explored why we should use ANCSA Village Corporations to develop resilient local economies. In short, a resilient, local, economy serves the needs of the Tlingit first. The western economy has not served our people well. In this part, we will look at some interesting demographics in our Alaska Native communities and discuss how municipal governments can be used and why they should be used to further the interests of the Tlingit people. To illustrate I will walk through how this strategy can be applied to the city of Yakutat’s opposition to mining activity in their region that would disrupt the local economy and way of life.

To start, here are some interesting demographic statistics from the 2000 Census:

Area: 38.6 square miles
Population: 572
Percentage Alaskan Native: 82%

Area: 8.7 square miles
Population: 860
Percentage Alaskan Native: 60.5%

Area: 9,459 square miles (that’s right. Nine thousand four hundred fifty-nine square miles)
Population: 808
Percentage Alaskan Native: 39.5%

Area: 14.2 square miles
Population: 710
Percentage Alaskan Native: 67%

We are specifically prohibited, under ANCSA, from forming a territorial tribal nation in Alaska. The reason for this is simple: resource control. The specific purpose of ANCSA was to settle land claims by Alaska Natives to pave the way for resource extraction; specifically oil extraction via the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. The last thing that those in power (legislators at the state and federal level and oil and mining companies) wanted in Alaska was a competing political and economic system standing in the way. Therefore, ANCSA was formed in such a way that:

  • a) Alaska Natives would get something in return for giving up interest in land and resources that the state wanted for its favorite oil companies.
  • b) Alaska Natives would get that something in the form of a profit-maximizing organization in the mold of the American Corporation.
  • The best way to describe this is as political horse trading, and this is the way American politics works. Those in power vie for more. The economic consequences of this reorganization of Tlingit life were explored in the previous article. We exhibit dismal rates of poverty in our communities. This is a fact of rural life in all of Alaska. There was a time when the Tlingit people used the resources around them to directly address their needs and wants, and the land was bountiful and rich. These days we must ask permission of the State to fish our territorial clan waters, and the jobs and wealth provided by our Village and Regional corporations largely bypass the Tlingit people in our communities.

    Economically, ANCSA and the American economy have left our communities in the dark. Just as important, we have been politically left in the dark as well. While we have honorable representatives and senators in the Alaska State Congress, our ability to control our own affairs has been greatly hampered. How, for instance, do we push for protection of our Alaska Native interests at the local level? The answer is to look at those existing political institutions that we do control, or could with just a little bit of effort.

    Looking at the 2000 census data above, we represent a total of 60% of the population in the towns of Angoon, Hoonah, Yakutat, and Kake which count under their jurisdiction over 9,500 square miles of territory. Add to this other towns and villages in southeast Alaska with majority Tlingit populations with less land such as Klawock and Klukwan. Then there are communities in which we are a minority such as Wrangell, Ketchikan and Juneau. Then there are our Haida brothers and sisters in Hydaburg, and our Tsimshian brothers and sisters in Metlakatla. Cumulatively we are a political force to be reckoned with throughout southeast Alaska; and our presence has been felt.

    The idea I propose here is to start thinking of the municipal governments in these communities as decentralized arms of the Tlingit Nation and use them to protect Tlingit interests throughout southeast Alaska. By virtue of the workings of small town democracy, this is already the case. So I offer the case of mining claims by Geohedral LLC around Yakutat as an example of how we can take this a step or two further and protect our interests through a decentralized response from various Tlingit controlled or Tlingit allied institutions.

    Geoheral LLC is a mining company based in Oklahoma City which has made a 60,000 acre mining claim in the Yakutat Forelands. The Alaska Native Brotherhood and National Congress of American Indians have already come out in opposition to the claim. The entire area is culturally significant to the Tlingit people and the fish and game the region produces has supported the people of Yakutat, white and native alike, for generations. The impact (pdf link) on the regions fishing industry would be devastating. Essentially, this mining project would destroy the local, sustainable, resilient fish and game based economy and replace it with one that serves the needs of outsiders rather than that of the people of Yakutat. While there may be short term gains in the local economy, many have questioned whether it is worth it to give up the resources that have sustained us for hundreds (if not thousands) of years for a short term pay off. Additionally, there are severe social consequences to such an abrupt change in the small town Alaska way of life. Have a look at Village Street in Juneau for an example.

    What is to be done? 450 out of Yakutat’s 600 residents have signed petitions opposing mining development. Fortunately for them, Yakutat is a unified city-borough that is the largest in the world by area and the mining claim falls well within its jurisdiction. Yakutat’s city government, if it represents the will of the people, could make life a living hell for Geohedral. An outright ban on mining within the city and borough would be convenient, though it may not hold up in court. If not, who cares? It will certainly buy time for Yakutat and draw more attention to the issue. If the people of Yakutat have the will, then their city government can be used as a tool to hamper Geohedral at every turn. Let’s put all those miles of red tape and city bureaucracy to good use for once! Have you ever tried to get an occupancy permit from a city government that doesn’t want you to have one? Hell, have you ever tried to get an occupancy permit from a city government that DOES want you to have one? I envision spontaneous city government holidays and odd hours of operation for public utilities and any other place Geohedral would need to go to conduct business prior to the beginning of mining operations. Of course, the city could get sued if it goes too far. But the point is to send a message, and delay and bog down the mining company as long as possible while the issue is elevated to a regional and state level. Then it is time to call in the tribe.

    Fortunately for the people of Yakutat, the Tlingit people think of Yakutat as one of their villages. It has been occupied by the Tlingit since before contact with Europeans and its bears a Tlingit name. The clans that occupy the region have a rich history and legitimate claims of ownership over the region. It is reasonable to believe that an attack on the Tlingit of Yakutat leaves all of the Tlingit vulnerable. With the city government of Yakutat employed in stalling and harassing tactics against Geohedral, the question becomes, how many Tlingits does it take to shut down a mining operation in one of our own communities? And we certainly wouldn’t be alone. Yakutat is only 40% Tlingit and 75% of the town has signed the petition voicing opposition to mining activity. An alliance with commercial and sports fishermen, charter boat operators and hunters would create a solid base of support in the community to launch a campaign of disruption. How many skiffs does it take to block a bay? How many bodies and cars does it take to occupy and block the critical spaces between the Yakutat airport and the nearest hotel? What would happen if every employee of the utility companies in the city walked off the job? What would happen if the people of Yakutat knew ahead of time and were prepared? The Tlingits of Yakutat, in control of their city government and in alliance with their neighboring Kwaans and clans could fight and win a war against Geohedral without a single casualty inflicted on either side. The question is whether we have the political will to begin thinking of ourselves as a nation, and start acting like one.

    About Vince

    I am a Tlingit, born and raised in Tlingit Country, and a proud member of the Tlingit Nation.
    This entry was posted in Building a Tlingit Nation, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

    18 Responses to Formulating a Strategy for an Independent Tlingit Nation – Part 2: Yakutat vs. Geohedral LLC

    1. Pingback: Tlingit Strategy for the Establishment of an Independent Tlingit Nation Part 2 | American Indian/Alaska Native – Attack The System

    2. Pingback: Formulating a Strategy for an Independent Tlingit Nation – Part 1 ANCSA Village Corporations | Lingit Latseen

    3. Aandeiyeen says:

      The mineral claims in the Yakutat Forelands have recently been forfeited, due to a lack of maintenance fee payments. So the area is safe- for now. There’s always a possibility of another company moving in at a future date with the same intentions. The Yaktuat Tlingit Tribe’s council is currently exploring ways to better protect the Yakutat Forelands from future mining activity.

      If you’ve looked at other Native communities that are impacted by mining activity, gaining an alliance with city government is not always easy. Take Duke Island for example- Ketchikan Indian Community has taken a strong stance against mining exploration on this culturally important site. In the Ketchikan Gateway Borough’s annexation proposal to expand their boundaries to include Duke Island (among other places), they only address the culturally sensitivity of development on Duke Island by stating that:
      “Due to the cultural sensitivity of the island, it is also likely that personnel would be stationed in Ketchikan and transported to the island in the event of mining operations there.” ( pg 30)

      In other words- they simply think that the tribes in the area are only upset of human presence on the island- rather than development itself. That is my intepretation, anyways, and that tells me they are way off base with the concerns of the tribal communities in that region.

      The City & Borough of Yakutat was instrumental in the past with assisting the Yakutat Tlingit Tribe to push for protecting the Yakutat Forelands from timber development in the past. Hence, the passage of the Tongass Timber Reform Act of 1990 which gave the Forelands LUD II status which prohibited commercial timber harvest. Here’s to hoping CBY will be of assistance to the efforts on adding additional protections against mining development and that other Native communities will have success in establishing similar alliances.

      Aandeiyeen, Yakutat Teikweidi

    4. ravenwarrior says:

      Gunalcheesh! Thank you for your valuable insight and update on this issue. I could only find this recent article from October 6, stating “that recent assays have failed to indicate commercial quantities of gold and silver in any of its 64,000 acres of claims in Alaska’s Yakutat Forelands.”,1490552.html

      It doesn’t surprise me that KGB doesn’t get it. We’ve lost much of our territorial interests over the years. So what do we do if city governments don’t respond to our interests? The state? The feds? They don’t always come through, either. In fact, they are more likely to side with those who will bring them more wealth or power, like mining and oil companies.

      Glad to hear that Yakutat is safe for now.

      Shtax’héen Kwáan

    5. Pingback: Yakutat vs. Geohedral LLC Update | Lingit Latseen

    6. Pingback: Building a de facto Tlingit Nation, Part 3 – Clans and tribal law | Lingit Latseen

    7. Pingback: Tribal and Clan Based Law | American Indian/Alaska Native – Attack The System

    8. Pingback: Native Americans gather in Portland to protest oil sands shipments | Lingit Latseen

    9. Pingback: | American Indian/Alaska Native – Attack The System

    10. Pingback: Glen Cove – Protecting Sacred Sites | Lingit Latseen

    11. Pingback: Glen Cove – Protecting Sacred Sites | American Indian/Alaska Native – Attack The System

    12. Pingback: Protecting Sacred Sites and Economic Resources – AKA How to Stop a Mine that is Threatening Your Clan’s Land and Livelihood | Lingit Latseen

    13. Pingback: The Scorched Earth Campaign Against the American Indians | American Indian/Alaska Native – Attack The System

    14. Pingback: The Scorched Earth Campaign Against the American Indians | Lingit Latseen

    15. Pingback: Attack the System » Blog Archive » The Scorched Earth Campaign Against The American Indians

    16. Pingback: Stopping the Peace River Dam | American Indian/Alaska Native – Attack The System

    17. Pingback: Attack the System » Blog Archive » Stopping the Peace River Dam

    18. Pingback: Stopping the Peace River Dam | Lingit Latseen

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

    You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

    Google photo

    You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

    Connecting to %s